April 19, 2019
April 16, 2019
Samurai Rebellion
To me, Masaki Kobayashi’s Samurai Rebellion is one
of the three greatest films ever made; the others are Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai and Ingmar Bergman’s The Seventh Seal.
Here’s why. The story is superbly written and of profound
importance. Basically, it poses the
question: how much injustice can a man of honor, integrity and courage
withstand before he rebels?
There is neither a wasted
word nor a wasted action. It is
beautifully directed. The acting is
uniformly excellent and Toshiro
Mifune is truly astounding. He was a
consummate artist, easily the greatest film actor of the last century. If this sounds like hyperbole, see his work
in Rashomon, the Samurai Trilogy, Throne
of Blood, The Rickshaw Man, Red Beard, as Cyrano, etc. He had it all – imagination, charm, warmth,
sensitivity, manliness, vitality, power, versatility, integrity, and most of
all, passion and dignity.
One of the signal keys to
great acting is the inner power and vitality that an actor emanates in his
silent moments. I call it intensity of
repose. It’s something you cannot fake. Mifune had it to a far greater extent than
any other actor I’ve ever seen. Further,
as Kurosawa said, “Mifune could show more variety and emotion in a shorter
period of time than any actor I ever saw.”
I guarantee that if you are
a basically a cynic, if you prefer naturalistic, everyday writing and acting, Samurai Rebellion is not for you. But if you are an incurable romantic who
believes that art should epitomize life and not simply copy it, if you long to
see passionate steadfastness, complete moral honesty, an inability to
compromise, and action based on principles, you will love this film.
March 07, 2019
March 01, 2019
Death of a Salesman: Director’s Notes
Alexander Barnett on Death of a Salesman
Thematic Content and Structure
This is
not the story of a salesman; it is the story of Willy Loman, who just happened
to be a salesman. This is not the story of Everyman. Willy’s passion, love and
drive go way beyond the norm. Perhaps most people will relate to Willy, be
moved by him and, most important, think, contemplate and learn from his life
and his mistakes.
Willy,
like Eddie Carbone in Arthur Miller’s A
View from the Bridge, demands to be “totally known”. Like Eddie, he could
never settle for half. He must attempt everything even if it means ending up
with nothing. He will risk his very life to achieve his “due”, what he
considers his rightful status. As Arthur Miller says, “The commonest of men may
take on that [tragic stature] to the extent of his willingness to throw all he
has into the contest, the battle to secure his rightful place in the world.” Of
course, this willingness automatically removes him from being the commonest of
men.
February 28, 2019
Introducing King Lear on Facebook
I thought you might be interested in taking a look at this page: https://www.facebook.com/KingLearFilm/?ref=settings
February 12, 2019
Director’s Notes – Episode 5 King Lear
There’s tension, intrigue,
distrust and anticipation throughout the country. An imminent civil war is brewing.
Oswald left Goneril’s at 4:30
in the morning and Kent (Caius) left 15 mins later. They’ve traveled many hours and they’ve
traveled hard. They’re exhausted.
They’ve gone sleepless this past night.
They arrive at 5:00 am. It’s late
Nov so it’s cold and dark. Regan and
Cornwall have just retired. We know from
the opening scene that Kent is a close friend of Gloucester’s so obviously he’s
been to Gloucester’s castle before and knows his way around.
Since Oswald doesn’t know where to set his horses he obviously hasn’t been here before and there’s no reason why he should have.
Since Oswald never would have gotten a good look at Caius (Kent in disguise) in the third scene and since it’s dark, there’s no reason he’d recognize him now. Kent, though, would certainly recognize Oswald, simply by his voice. In his pursuit of Oswald he has unwittingly worked himself into a rage. What creates even greater outrage is that he thinks Oswald does know who he is.
Since Oswald doesn’t know where to set his horses he obviously hasn’t been here before and there’s no reason why he should have.
Since Oswald never would have gotten a good look at Caius (Kent in disguise) in the third scene and since it’s dark, there’s no reason he’d recognize him now. Kent, though, would certainly recognize Oswald, simply by his voice. In his pursuit of Oswald he has unwittingly worked himself into a rage. What creates even greater outrage is that he thinks Oswald does know who he is.
February 06, 2019
Still Life with Booze
I've written a new one-act comedy.
Cast of Characters for Still Life with Booze
Toulouse Lautrec: A man of remarkable psychological insight and abundant goodwill toward his devoted friend. He is understanding, witty, gay, lively and outstandingly original.
Paris - 1887
Paul Gauguin: Intelligent, virile, domineering and sarcastic, a born leader with an outrageous sense of humor.
Toulouse Lautrec: A man of remarkable psychological insight and abundant goodwill toward his devoted friend. He is understanding, witty, gay, lively and outstandingly original.
Camille Pissarro: Warm, intelligent, emotional and virtually ageless. Generous to a fault, he has no regard for material things.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)